We, Not Me: Elise for Mayor of Newberg

Our Newberg neighbors are tired. 

Tired of the partisan bickering, for sure, but also weary of an affordability crisis that has beset our hometown. Water bills are too high, and the lack of jobs that pay a sustainable wage means that too many people are struggling to make ends meet. We’re also tired of feeling like our voices don’t matter at city hall, and that our local government isn’t always listening to our concerns.

That’s why Newberg Neighbors for a Better Community was excited to hear that Elise Yarnell Hollaman is running for Newberg mayor, and will take on incumbent Bill Rothsaker in November’s election. Elise has served on the Newberg City Council since 2018, understands our community well, and will work hard to assure that Newberg truly is a great place for everyone to thrive. 

Her campaign is focused on the idea of “We, Not Me,” a promise that intends to end partisanship in city hall. By promoting collaboration, Elise will also assure that everyone in Newberg has a seat at the decision-making table, even if they don’t always agree on the decisions being made. This is truly what leadership is about: drawing together different stakeholders and allowing them to be heard, as well as embracing difference as a strength that will lead to better decisions for all.

Elise’s promises are grounded in several specific efforts that will move Newberg forward:

Lowering Water Bills: Newberg households have some of the highest water bills state wide, and paying so much for water can be crushing for many families. Newberg families need more than incremental reductions in their water bills. 

We need to pursue structural changes that can actually bring costs down.

As mayor, Elise will initiate conversations with Dundee and Dayton about creating a regional approach to water infrastructure, including exploring a regional water district and shared treatment infrastructure.

Working regionally could allow our communities to pursue state and federal infrastructure funding together, share major capital costs, and strengthen our competitiveness for limited infrastructure dollars.

Her goal is simple: pursue every viable option capable of meaningfully lowering the cost of water for Newberg families.

Bring back jobs: Newberg cannot afford to keep watching employers and living-wage jobs leave our community. For years, the city government talked about economic development while major employment properties have remained difficult to develop.

It’s time to move from talking about jobs to preparing land for them.

Available urban renewal resources are tools that can be prioritized in a way to support job growth. Elise will push to remove infrastructure and predevelopment barriers that are preventing key employment land—including the former mill property by the river—from becoming development-ready.

Then she will lead an initiative to recruit manufacturing, technology, and trade-sector businesses to create careers here, in Newberg, allowing people to raise their families and build a future here. 

Her goal is simple: Elise will do everything to prepare land, compete for employers, and bring living-wage jobs back to Newberg.

Listen to Everyone: Newberg has spent too much time fighting national culture wars at the local level while the work directly affecting people’s daily lives waits for our attention. 

We can all agree that it’s time for our local government to solve problems, not pick sides.  

Disagreements are a gift, and can make the government better when leaders are willing to listen and learn from each other–and from the constituents they serve. Collaboration isn’t a dirty word, but an opportunity to recognize that no political party, ideology, neighborhood, or individual has a monopoly on good ideas–and then work together to improve the lives of everyone

As mayor, Elise promises to protect space for disagreement, expect respectful leadership from the Council, and make sure people know they can participate in their city government regardless of their politics.

Her goal is simple: Elise will focus on common ground between different stakeholders, because common ground is common sense, and local leadership works best when everyone is invited to the decision-making table. 

Over the next few months, Newberg Neighbors will be working hard to help elect Elise, because we love our community and want it to thrive, and because we believe Elise offers the best opportunity to move Newberg forward. We hope you’ll join us in these efforts. Stay tuned for specific ways you can help make Newberg a better community.

Concern about Affordable Housing Decision

Newberg City Council recently approved a large amount of grant money from their construction excise tax funds to a new organization. A Newberg resident is asking the council to reconsider. This is the letter she sent to the mayor and the council.

Dear Newberg City Mayor & Council Members,  

I am writing to ask the council to reconsider its recent decision to fund the SPARK housing program with $742,934.52 from the CET fund. I am extremely disappointed that the council decided to ignore:  

  1. the Affordable Housing Committee’s recommendation,  
  2. the fact that the SPARK program didn’t even meet the criteria to be eligible for the funds,  
  3. the underlying classism and patronizing assumptions of the whole SPARK program,  
  4. some very basic money facts, and       
  5. the fact that the SPARK program won’t help the families in our community that most need housing assistance.  

The Affordable Housing Committee took seriously their duty to review applications objectively and plainly laid out its reasons for rejecting SPARK. The committee’s decision was, quite simply, based on SPARK not meeting the objective criteria that ALL applicants were judged by. (I am sorry that Mayor Rosacker feels that those criteria favor 501(c)3 organizations, but perhaps there’s a reason for that: other organizations have some legitimacy AND more than just the “concept of a plan.”) I question whether other organizations would have received funding if they, too, had not even met the basic criteria. While the mayor publicly recused himself from the discussion/decision of the council at the meeting, the whole thing just smells wrong.  

Furthermore, in the same meeting, City Manager Will Worthey recommended recognizing Newsberg as a media outlet based on the established criteria and scoring system. Yet when it came to spending a great deal of money, the council ignored the established criteria. WHY would the council accept the current scoring criteria for something far less significant, but shrug off the affordable housing committee’s recommendation, which was based on established objective criteria?  

Being a retired nurse, former City of Newberg firefighter/paramedic and a college graduate, I have nothing against the teachers, nurses, and firefighters that SPARK identified as their target demographic. I understand the challenges of commuting to work as I commuted to work at Providence St. Vincent and Kaiser Westside for years. However, what the council fails to recognize is that the aforementioned demographic generally HAS housing stability. It may not be in Newberg, but these professionals are housed.  

You know who generally doesn’t have stable or affordable housing? Minimum wage earners, hospitality workers, grocery store clerks, caregivers, seasonal workers, or disabled folks. These folks also work in Newberg and would probably like to be able to live in Newberg. Living where they work is especially important when transportation is often an expense they struggle with as well. Unfortunately, it appears that this is a demographic that Mayor Rosacker and the rest of the SPARK board find less desirable or worthy to help. This is classism, hidden in plain sight.  

Beyond the classism, though, is the patronizing assumption that the reason people can’t afford housing in Newberg is because they are bad with money and need financial education (48 months of financial education, for crying out loud!) People can’t afford houses in Newberg because all that is being built is $400,000+ homes and because everyday things cost more, thanks to tariffs, corporate greed, and food rotting in the fields with no one to pick it.  

More concerning is the fact that the program is not fully fleshed out, and while the SPARK website recently deleted references to “relational, emotional, and spiritual development”, we have no idea exactly what ideological education program participants would have to agree to participate in for 48 months in order to have a chance at a grant for a down payment. If the program proves to be too patronizing or onerous, the participants would be forced to leave and then have to find new housing. The program’s stated desire to avoid the tenant/landlord relationship would further expose participants to unfair risk from waiving important tenant rights they would have had in a traditional housing situation.  

Lastly, by doing some basic calculations, I found that this program will NOT be nearly as helpful as it claims to be. Using a basic mortgage calculator, I calculated that the average Newberg home priced at $426,600 would require a down payment of $85,320 (20%). The SPARK program would allow the participant to apply for a grant that averages around $38,400 (figuring a program contribution of $800/month for 48 months.) This is not quite half of the necessary down payment.  

Additionally, the monthly mortgage payment for the sample home would be $2215.52.  

  • Households making 80% of median income make $72,800 a year or $6066.67/month before taxes or likely around $4,000/month take home pay.  
  • Households making 50% of median income make $45,500 a year or $3791.67/month before taxes or likely around $2900/month take home pay.  
  • A person working 40 hours per week at $17/hour makes $35,360/year or $2946.67/month before taxes or likely around $2300/month take home pay  

This means that SPARK’s stated target demographic (who usually already have housing stability before entering the program) would be looking at purchasing a home whose mortgage payment is more than half of their monthly income. Poorer households (that struggle with housing stability and may be unhoused) will find that a mortgage payment would be most, if not all, of their monthly take-home pay. The poorer folks would also struggle to afford even the “market rate” rent that the SPARK program would require. On top of all of this, none of these income levels would qualify for a mortgage for a $426,600 home, unless they get a really questionable and predatory lender.  

Bottom line, the decision to award the CET money to SPARK does not bear up under further examination. The program won’t help the Newberg residents and workers that need help the most and it has all the appearance of being a classist, patronizing, ideologically based way to help a “more deserving” group of people. The math doesn’t add up. Finally, there isn’t even a solid program to evaluate. The affordable housing committee had it right. The city council needs to reverse this decision.  

Sincerely,  

Sonda Martin  

Newberg resident and homeowner  

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑